Barack Obama’s historically trip to Kenya and African union
headquarter in Addis Ababa mid last year was characterized by two major factors;
homosexuality and denouncing the elite of long serving leaders. Even though,
media coverage was focused on his statement on homosexuality little was covered
on his denouncing of long serving leaders other than a short video clip of his
address at the congress of African union. And from the applause's and laughter,
it was evident the congress had heard the message loud and clear, but 8 months
from that historically appearance and speech, Uganda is in the limelight for
both pre and post elections chaos, that involve old rivals that seem to have
just renewed they more than 10 years rivalry.
With echoes of celebration all around the continental,
people are geared to choose leaders from all corners, but what factors really
characterize African elections, it is personalized fights that are turned into
national fights that divide Africans on ethnic, tribal and religious lines that
can escalate into serious violence. In this edition we will look at the
struggles of power between four figures that can be streted back to the 60s or
80s
President Museveni
and Besigye
And it’s no doubt that African elections are indeed chemical
elections and politics of tear gas characterized by kungu-Fu and takwaedo on
the rival opposition leaders by the police and military wings. And if the is
one politician that has faced a lot of such situations is Besigye an opposition
leader who has been once been beaten by state security like a common criminal
without rights who claim Besigye incited violence. But what violence can he incite
when most of his time as opposition leader have been characterized by house
arrest, exile, endless court courts and assault to mention a few. Indeed what Besigye
has and will experience comes as no shock to most Africans because opposition
leaders dance to the same rhythm by incumbents overall the continental, but
what makes Besigye’s case surprise is that he was once a personal doctor to the
incumbent president Yoweri Museveni in the 1980s. this means the incumbent
might has had a relationship in the past when they were both rebels, but what
led to a harass relationship; it is a good business turned sour, leadership and
democracy turned dictatorship or just a friendship that was ordained in hell. The
answer to the latter, lies in the hands of the Ugandan people who love their
country and look forward to a better tomorrow.
And not long ago, a Museveni and Besigye show down was observed,
no doubt Besigye deserves a Guinness Book of Record recognition for the ‘Most
arrested before and after an election’, because that’s what he has experienced
this year and I challenge the people of Uganda to question the intentions of
their leading politicians because Uganda is bigger than personal battles turned
national agendas.
President Kenyatta vs
Odinga
One cannot understand why Kenyan politics is dominated by
the Kenyatta’s and Odingas or tribal clashes between the luos and the kikuyu,
but that can be answered with a close look at Kenya pre and post-independence.
Before independence, the greatest tool the colonial masters used to prevent any
uprising was to divide Africans on tribal lines and keep each tribe suspicious
of the other, but after 1963 Kenyans were united and gained they independence
in 19 December 1963 with Mzee Jomo Kenyatta as president while Jaramogi Oginga
Odinga as vice president.
Now it is important to understand that both Kenyatta and
Odinga were explosive figures that represented two powerful political tribes of
the kikuyu and Luo that are sworn rivals but with Kenyatta and Odinga these two
political tribes’ rivalry was put aside for the sake of freedom from the
British. But this union was short-lived due to conflicting policies after the
Kisumu massacre that created instability in the Luo community followed but the
assassination of two prominent politicians which initially created more
tensions.
With Odinga out in the cold as a fugitive opposition leader
in the 1966 with his Kenyan people union (KPU) denouncing the government of
Kenyatta heated exchange of words was the norm between them, which later led to
Kenyan people union being banned and its leaders arrested in 1969 and Kenya
became a’ de fecto’, single party state. Though the one party state statue was verified
through amendment of the constitution by Kenyatta’s successor following his
death in 1978. And this marked Jaramogi journey in the wilderness of the
opposition which his son, Raila inherited after his death in 1994.
Curse or blessing the dominance of the two families has seen
the Kenyatta’s being a major force while the Odingas are seeking to be a force,
but will 2017 be a victorious year for the Odinga or maybe the curse of poor
finishing will take effect. Raila like his father has criticized Kenyatta’s
tactic in dealing with corruption, but is Raila and Besigye power-hungry attention
seekers or they have the will of the people at heart.
Name
|
Country
|
President Salva Kiir vs Riek Machar
President Uhuru Kenyatta vs Raila Odinga
President Yoweri Museveni vs Besigye
President Alassane Outtara vs
Laurent Gbagbo
|
South Sudan
Kenya
Uganda
Ivory Coast
|
The list is endless,
but it is important to understand how a personal battle can turn out to be a
national battle.
President Salva Kiir
and his deputy Riek Machar
After several years of guerrilla warfare, which killed
atleast a million of people and more displaced, South Sudan became an
independent country in July 2011 after a referendum that saw her break away
from Sudan. With a lot of hope and happiness of a better future filled the
hearts and faces of the newly independent state with they country being
labelled a ‘model of 21 century democracy’.
With a record of having Africa’s longest running civil war,
south Sudan is no stranger to negative news such that in 2013, it made
worldwide headlines when the president Kiir fired his whole cabinet and
accusing his deputy Machar of planning a failed coup which led to war among the
loyalists of the latter.
With both leaders fighting their personal battle on the
tribal lines the president hails from the Dinka and the Nuer tribes back Machar
and the Dinka and Nuer are the country’s biggest ethnic groups, the Dinka being
the biggest at 36% and the Nuer at 16%. Furthermore, the Dinka and Nuer tribes
are well known longtime rivals whose rivalries began in the 19th
century over land and resources, hence it is no surprise they rivalry has been
renewed in the 21st century.
Even though, President Silva and Machar are highly regarded
as freedom fighters, it is important to understand that both the president and
his deputy are architecturers of the present violence and I believe the people
of South Sudan are held hostages to instability caused by the two leaders. And
the same applies to the crisis in Burundi where the leadership has held the
people hostage all in the name of governance. And to name a few possible
personalized fights turned national issues watch out for President Kabila and Moises
Katumbi and not forgetting President Zuma and Julius Malema and it is true that
in politics the are no permanent enemies, but the impact of these personal
battles may or has led to loss of lives.
Conclusion
It is important to understand that this article does not
discourage competition, but speaks out against competitions that uses tribalism,
violence and ignorance as raw materials for competition. I believe an elections
is a competition which is inspired by constructive arguments and competitive
ideas and the will to serve not an appetite of violence and thirst of blood of
innocent souls.